Eddie Lee Howard was twice sentenced to die primarily based virtually solely on bite mark evidence, and a forensic dentist’s testimony that there was “no doubt” Howard’s tooth matched bruises discovered on a homicide sufferer’s physique. After 26 years on Mississippi’s dying row, Howard was exonerated in January, making him at the least the twenty eighth individual in America to be freed after chunk mark proof was discredited by DNA.
In 2012, almost 30 years after an FBI investigator testified that hairs discovered at a homicide scene belonged to Santae A. Tribble—and that there was “one chance in 10 million” these strands may have come from another person— Tribble’s conviction was overturned and DNA proof revealed one of many hairs was actually from a dog. Anthony Ray Hinton was convicted of two murders primarily based on an inaccurate bullet match made through a forensic firearms evaluation. By the point Hinton was free of an Alabama jail in 2015, he had spent three many years on dying row.
The Innocence Mission finds “the misapplication of forensic science contributed to 52 % of wrongful convictions” within the instances it has efficiently tackled, whereas the Nationwide Registry of Exonerations has recognized “false or deceptive forensic proof” as a “contributing think about 24 % of all wrongful convictions nationally.”